navigation
|
||||||
Mark Your Calendar for 2012
October 8-12, 2012 » Join the priority contact list today » Check out who you can expect to see at BPI 2012 with new products and services Download Event GuideFounding PublicationLearn more about receiving a free subscription. Add to Outlook CalendarJoin our LinkedIn Group: BioProcessing Professionals. my IBCFind Another IBC EventRelated Events
|
The Meeting Place for the Bioprocessing IndustryConference: October 08-12, 2012 · Pre-Conference SymposiaPre-Conference Symposia
Symposia: Monday | Main Conference
12:00
Registration
Symposium #1:
Contamination Control - Lessons Learned, Best Practices and Case Studies
1:00
Chairperson's Remarks
Robert D. Kiss, Ph.D., Director, Late Stage Cell Culture, BioProcess Development, Genentech, Inc.
1:15
Viral Safety at the Critical Raw Material Level
Claudia Buser, Ph.D., Director, Global Cell Banking, Technology Development, Genzyme Corporation Unpublished Data
1:45
Case
Study
Debugging Bioreactors: The Biogen Idec Experience
Anurag Khetan, Ph.D., Senior Manager, Cell Culture Development, Biogen Idec
2:15
Making Every Detail Important so Microbial Contamination is not an Option
Develop strategies and implement best practices around bioprocessing equipment and documentation to ensure operational success. A detail look at some tools used to support routinely bringing a manufacturing facility on-line effectively. Focus on the details of documentation to ensure clarity and consistency during execution to help mitigate contamination failure. Anthony Williams, Senior Manager, Manufacturing Operations, Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
2:45
Networking Refreshment Break
3:15
Case
Single Event vs. Adverse Trend: Trials and Tribulations of Investigating ContaminationsStudy A case study for leveraging network expertise to develop a business process for resolving bioreactor contaminations and experiences in applying it to single event contaminations as well as an intractable bioreactor contamination. This work proposes tools to identify contamination risks, and shares interesting findings from previous contaminations. Marcella Goodnight, Senior Manager, Process Engineering, Genentech, Inc.
3:45
Search for a Needle in a Haystack, or just Deploy Better Thimbles - Lessons Learned in Improving Bioreactor Pure Culture Capability
Definitively identifying/addressing bioreactor contamination root cause can be a tricky endeavor in a capable facility with a high success rate. To further improve bioreactor pure culture capability, weaknesses are continually evaluated and high-risk targets identified for remediation. This case study will describe the general approach taken, and various specific findings and preventive/corrective actions implemented. Stacey Masaaki Kaneshiro, Senior Consultant Engineer, Bioproduct R&D, Bioprocess Operations, Eli Lilly & Company
4:15
Bacillus Wars - Tips on Eliminating One of the Most Troublesome Organisms in Bioprocessing
Bacillus spp. contamination is one of the most common and intractable problems that you will encounter in bioprocess operations. Drawing on over 30 years of experience trouble-shooting processes, Tim's talk will help you understand how the biology of the organism helps you diagnose when the infection occurred, where it might be lodged and how to eliminate it. Tim Hughes, Director, Clinical Manufacturing, CSL Ltd., Australia
4:45
Audience Interactive Panel Discussion
5:15
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
Symposium #2:
Incorporating Single-Use in Process Development and Scale Up
1:00
Chairperson's Remarks
Adam Goldstein, MS., Senior Manager, Oceanside Clinical Operations, Genentech, Inc.
1:15
Recent Experiences with Single-Use Containers Used for Media Storage, Media Handling and Cell Culture
Disposables are used for liquid media storage, handling media prior to cell culture inoculation, and for cell culture operations. We investigated disposables for our cell culture processes to better understand and prevent negative impact on cell growth and product yields correlated with specific disposables and the conditions of their use. We will review the challenges, knowledge gained and lessons learned. Masaru Shiratori, Ph.D., Engineer II, Late Stage Cell Culture, Pharma Technical Development, Genentech, Inc.
1:45
Scaling up and Technology Transfer of New SUB Process from Development to Manufacturing
Paul McCormac, Ph.D., Senior Manager, Biomanufacturing Sciences Group, Pfizer, Inc.
2:15
Implementation of Single-Use Technology in Laboratory- and Manufacturing-Scale Downstream Processing
Ronald Bates, Ph.D., Director, Downstream Processing and Stability, Biologics Development, Allergan Inc.
2:45
Networking Refreshment Break
3:15
Scaling up from Process Development to Manufacturing Using Disposables
CMC Biologics, a contract development and manufacturing organization, has implemented single-use systems in seed train through 50L bioreactors (SUBs) for process development and through 500 L GMP manufacturing scale. Currently, a 2000L SUB is being qualified at the CMC Copenhagen facility. SUB evaluation started over three years ago with demonstration units in the process development labs where initial problems were uncovered and addressed. In addition to utilizing vendor data, systematic experimentation was necessary to match SUB performance to our reusable bioreactor systems (small and large scale) that have been in place for many years. Parts of the downstream process have also been successfully transitioned to single-use technology including harvest, flow-through ion-exchange purification, and UF/DF. Single-use mixing systems are utilized throughout the GMP manufacturing process. CMC is transitioning to 3 L SUBs for process development, but curiously, smaller single-use systems for process development have lagged behind development of the larger systems. Practical advantages of single-use systems as well as issues encountered will be discussed. Leland Paul, Ph.D., Vice President, Process Development, CMC ICOS Biologics, Inc.
3:45
Scaling Up Disposables Applications from Non-GMP to GMP Condition
Scaling up Disposable applications has been a very popular topic over the last few years. The scope of this talk will be focused on small scale applications, how they are implemented, tested and how they are than tech transfered and used in large scale GMP processes. Special emphasis will be given to qualifications of the materials and testing of larger scale applications for GMP processes. Adam Goldstein, MS., Principle Scientist Oceanside Operations, Genentech, Inc
4:15
How Suppliers can Aid Drug Manufacturers in Meeting GMP Requirements for Large Scale Disposables Manufacturing
Suppliers of single-use process systems have expanded responsibilities beyond manufacture or sourcing of components and systems assembly. As the primary integrator and source, systems providers need to address a wide range of user GMP requirements. These range from process and system design, e.g. incorporating means for filter integrity testing, provision of extractables data and services for product-specific migrant/leachables testing where needed. Other quality factors include component and connection leak testing, particle and endotoxin testing, sterilization validation, shipping, storage and shelf life qualification.. This talk will provide an overview of activities that drug manufacturers can source from and partner with suppliers to meet GMP requirements. Jerold Martin, M.S., Senior Vice President, Scientific Affairs, Pall Life Sciences
4:45
Audience Interactive Panel Discussion
5:15
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
Symposium #3:
Understanding Lyophilization and Designing an Optimal Lyophilization ProcessSymposium Leader: J. Jeff Schwegman, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, AB BioTechnologies
1:00
Symposium Begins
Objective: Specific focus will paid to the biologically based products (globular proteins, monoclonal antibodies, etc.), as these types of therapeutic molecules are coming to represent a larger part of the injectable drug market, and require additional care in development due to the instabilities in the physical structure of these types of molecules. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is becoming more and more educated in the practice and science of lyophilization. As such, they are asking more questions about lyophilization during NDA or ANDA document reviews, site visits to companies producing lyophilized products, etc. It is now expected by the FDA, that companies developing new formulations and lyophilization cycles must be able to explain, scientifically, why they have chosen each excipient they have added to a formulation, why they are using as much as they have added, what are the critical temperatures of the products (glass transition temperature, Tg' or eutectic melting temperature, Te), etc. Companies that cannot produce this type of information run the risk of being delayed in getting their products approved and on the market, which can have a dramatic impact on their profit margin. This workshop is intended to provide guidance and insight in the development of sound formulations and optimized drying processes for lyophilized parenteral drug products.
About the Symposium Leader: Dr. Schwegman received his BS in Biochemistry from Indiana University in 1992 and began working at Cook Imaging in Bloomington Indiana, where he gained experience in analytical, formulation and process development of parenteral products. In 1999 he began graduate study in the Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy at Purdue University under the direction of Dr. Steve Nail, where his focus of research involved studying changes in the physical structure of biological molecules during lyophilization. Dr. Schwegman received his Ph.D. from Purdue University in 2003, and returned to Bloomington where he worked at Baxter Pharmaceutical Solutions as a Research Scientist in the Pharmaceutical Development group. In November 2005, he left Baxter and formed BioConvergence LLC with 3 other founders which specialized in developing new formulations and manufacturing processes for parenteral products. In February 2008, he left BioConvergence, which has become a successful company, to form AB BioTechnologies. He routinely lectures around the world on formulation, stabilization and process development of lyophilized products.
5:00
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
Symposium #4:
Global Strategies and Experience in the Development of Biosimilars
1:00
Co-Chairpersons' Introductory Remarks
Neil L. Schauer, Ph.D., Senior Director, Process Development , Global Biologics R&D, Hospira, Inc. Joerg Windisch, Ph.D., Head Global Technical Development, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Austria Keynote Address:
1:15
Commercial Overview of the Biosimilars MarketplaceWhile the US is developing a Biosimilars approval procedure, we can look to Europe to understand Biosimilars market development which has proven more robust than some critics have predicted. European science based standards have not been an impediment to success with 14 products already on the market. Adoption has been driven without pharmacy-level substitution and occurs when the biosimilar concept is well understood. Thus continuing education will be critical to drive further adoption. Gillian M. Cannon, MBA, Ph.D., Vice President and Commercial Head, Merck & Co., Inc.
2:00
Strategies for Development and Manufacturing of Biosimilars
Biosimilars are expected to significantly increase global availability of protein therapies within the coming years. Development of biosimilar therapeutics require enhanced control of manufacturing processes in order to match essential characteristics of the originator molecules, while still ensuring safe, high quality and lower cost versions of these drugs. This presentation will discuss the evolving scientific and regulatory framework for biosimilars as well as the enhanced manufacturing control strategies that allow for their manufacture and approval. Neil L. Schauer, Ph.D., Senior Director, Process Development, Global Biologics R&D, Hospira, Inc.
2:40
Networking Refreshment Break
3:00
Relevance of a Comparability Approach for Innovator Biologics to Determination of Biosimilarity
Comparability and similarity are two distinct concepts. The concept of comparability defined by regulators applies to changes made by a manufacturer to its own process and product. Knowledge of a product's unique development history, program of analytical characterization and link to clinical experience (clinical and pre-clinical lots) allow a comparability exercise not possible for a biosimilar manufacturer. Earl S. Dye, Ph.D., Director, Technical Regulatory Policy & Strategy, Genentech Inc., A Member of the Roche Group Unpublished Data
3:40
Case
Process Development of mAb Biosimilar in Consideration of Comparability IssuesStudy Shin-Jae Chang, Ph.D., Vice President, Research & Development, Celltrion, Inc., Korea
4:20
Audience Interactive Panel Discussion
5:00
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
Symposium #5:
Case Studies of Process and Analytical Transfers in Biomanufacturing
1:00
Chairperson's Remarks
Jean Bender, Ph.D., Director, Purification Engineering, MedImmune
1:15
Cell Culture Process Development Strategies for Technology Transfers and Scale-Up
Defining process parameters for inoculum expansion, seed and production bioreactor stages from small-scale runs for developing robust processes will be explained. Facility fit process steps at CMO facility or difference manufacturing sites will be addressed. Monitoring and troubleshooting at early transfer stages assisted in successful technology transfers during scale and facility changes. Customizing feed media compositions and preparations suitable to manufacturing facility, media ID test methods and supply logistics for manufacturing will be discussed. XiaoPing Dai, Ph.D., Manager, Cell Culture and Fermentation Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb
1:45
Squeezing a Square Peg into a Round Hole: Transfer of a Non-Platform Bacterial Purification Process to an Existing Facility
Purification processes of biologics produced in bacterial hosts are typically quite diverse. The diversity in process design poses a challenge when transferring bacterial processes from one facility to another. A case study of the transfer of a non-mAb purification process into an existing facility will be examined. Addressing the gaps between facility capabilities and process requirements involves tradeoffs in facility modifications versus process modifications, and in facility downtime versus resource investment. The impact of these tradeoffs and lessons learned from this transfer will be discussed. Judy Chang, M.S., Engineer II, Biologics Manufacturing Science & Technology, Genentech, Inc.
2:15
Case Study on the Drug Product Technology Transfer Process
A complex drug product manufacturing technology transfer process required three unique stages based on changes in: (1) manufacture site; (2) formulation, drug substance scale and drug product presentation; and (3) drug substance storage condition; all of which had a direct effect on the secondary manufacture process. These stage-related challenges faced in producing commercially acceptable batches will be discussed. Charlene Brisbane, Investigator, Biopharmaceutical Technologies, GlaxoSmithKline
2:45
Networking Refreshment Break
3:15
Starting, Qualifying and Licensing a New Facility for Biologics Production in Asia
A case study will be presented on the startup, qualification, and licensing of a new facility for biologics production in Asia. This presentation will also discuss the transfer of an existing commercial bacterial-derived process, some of the challenges faced, and the risk control strategies that have been used to manage the risk. Harry Lam, Ph.D., Senior Director, Global Biologics Manufacturing Science & Technology, Genentech, Inc.
3:45
How to Make a Successful Analytical Transfer
The key to ensuring a successful analytical transfer is to establish a smooth communication channel. This can be greatly challenged by the cultural or language differences between the transferring and receiving labs, in addition to the complexity of the test methods. To support smooth communication, the strategic planning should be laid out at the beginning of the transfer, where definite roles/responsibilities of each party, deliverables, and timelines/milestones need to be established. A thorough assessment of the capabilities of the receiving lab (including instruments, personal training records, and a comprehensive documentation system) is necessary to ensure the transfer process complies to quality and regulatory requirements. Last but not the least, a routine follow up and constant monitoring of the transfer status (statues) is equally important to fulfill the task in a timely manner. Chaomei Lin, Associate Director, PDMS AD LMMD, Janssen R&D, Johnson & Johnson
4:15
Analytical Method Transfer
Analytical Method is the impartial judge of the quality of the bioprocess and its product. It is with paramount importance to establish a robust and objective testing system which can allow for flexibility and scalability during bioprocess transfer. Our discussion will focus on analytical method transfers for raw material testing, product testing involving analytical methods, cell based potency methods and microbial methods; transfers during different phases of product development and the measures needed to maintain the state of control before, during and after the analytical method transfer completed. Zhenhong Li, Ph.D., Director, Quality Control, Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
4:45
Audience Interactive Panel Discussion
5:15
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
Symposium #6:
Using DOE Effectively for Process Characterization Without Getting Lost in the StatisticsSymposium Leader: Rajiv Nayar, Ph.D., President and Founder, HTD Biosystems, Inc.
1:00
Symposium Begins
Design of Experiments (DOE) is a powerful tool used to define and optimize process design space. Used effectively, it can maximize process knowledge and generate results rapidly with minimal resource usage. This symposium provides an overview of the application of DOE as a tool for process characterization, and provides guidelines for when you should and should not apply DOE in developing and understanding your production processes. You'll learn how to select the right DOE design, and be introduced to the concept of Experiments by Design (EbD) and how it is used to effectively perform DOE. The symposium will also examine how DOE can be applied to FDA guidelines on Process Validation and Quality by Design. The session focuses primarily on the application of DOE, rather than the statistical theories behind it.
5:00
Close of Pre-Conference Symposium
| |||||
footer
|
||||||